<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consequences of the Coalition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://augustainsider.us/consequencescoalition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://augustainsider.us/consequencescoalition/</link>
	<description>Navigating the corridors of power in Maine&#039;s capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:28:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://augustainsider.us/consequencescoalition/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augustainsider.us/?p=2820#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>What an absurd ball of fluff. 
 
Restricting government funding for abortions equates to &quot;a return to the dark days of coat hangers and back alley abortions&quot;???  What kind of nonsense is that? 
 
This is pretty simple.  If a woman wants an abortion, she needs to pony up the money for it herself.  Government money going to such a divisive procedure is inappropriate, and the removal of monetary support has absolutely NOTHING to do with its legality. 
 
What an absurd straw man argument, Ben. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an absurd ball of fluff. </p>
<p>Restricting government funding for abortions equates to &quot;a return to the dark days of coat hangers and back alley abortions&quot;???  What kind of nonsense is that? </p>
<p>This is pretty simple.  If a woman wants an abortion, she needs to pony up the money for it herself.  Government money going to such a divisive procedure is inappropriate, and the removal of monetary support has absolutely NOTHING to do with its legality. </p>
<p>What an absurd straw man argument, Ben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
