<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gubernatorial Twitter Update #4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://augustainsider.us/govtwitter4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://augustainsider.us/govtwitter4/</link>
	<description>Navigating the corridors of power in Maine&#039;s capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:28:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AugustaInsider</title>
		<link>http://augustainsider.us/govtwitter4/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>AugustaInsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augustainsider.us/?p=385#comment-46</guid>
		<description>In the coming days, probably next weekend after Update 5, we&#039;ll post a graph of the candidate&#039;s growth over time on Twitter, to show how they&#039;re doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the coming days, probably next weekend after Update 5, we&#8217;ll post a graph of the candidate&#8217;s growth over time on Twitter, to show how they&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AugustaInsider</title>
		<link>http://augustainsider.us/govtwitter4/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>AugustaInsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augustainsider.us/?p=385#comment-45</guid>
		<description>We did revise this post to remove the criticism, it was a fair point.

No real formula, we&#039;re just looking overall at all three factors - Followers, Followed, and number of Tweets. We think having 10,000 followers isn&#039;t very impressive if you only have 10 Tweets, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did revise this post to remove the criticism, it was a fair point.</p>
<p>No real formula, we&#8217;re just looking overall at all three factors &#8211; Followers, Followed, and number of Tweets. We think having 10,000 followers isn&#8217;t very impressive if you only have 10 Tweets, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://augustainsider.us/govtwitter4/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augustainsider.us/?p=385#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Okay, fair enough - I didn&#039;t mean to make you mad, it just didn&#039;t make sense to me.  Its a cool list, I just assumed you were going on followers.

Could you perhaps let us in on how you determine the &quot;overall&quot; winner?  Not really interesting in disputing it, I&#039;m just curious what formula you are using.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, fair enough &#8211; I didn&#8217;t mean to make you mad, it just didn&#8217;t make sense to me.  Its a cool list, I just assumed you were going on followers.</p>
<p>Could you perhaps let us in on how you determine the &#8220;overall&#8221; winner?  Not really interesting in disputing it, I&#8217;m just curious what formula you are using.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
